Select a Chapter to start the quiz.
Mapp v. Ohio was not a case about an illegal search but ended up incorporating the exclusionary rule.
The Court has never granted an exception to the exclusionary rule.
When it comes to the Fourth Amendment, the Court has been consistent that cars have less protection than homes or businesses from searches and seizures.
If a suspect in a crime does not know she is speaking to a law enforcement official, she does not need to be read her Miranda warning.
The Warren Court was the era in which rights of the criminally accused expanded the most.
The Court has never granted an exception to the protection against unreasonable searches and seizures.
