1: Alex
‘Alex knew that the tablet form of the antiemetic he was prescribed worked better for him as opposed to the intravenous form given through his central line, but the nurses did not listen to him. On one occasion I had to go through all his notes to ‘prove’ his point – that he had been prescribed the tablet form before and to ensure he was always written up for the right thing for him, and not what was usually given without exception to all patients on the oncology ward. I found this type of situation very distressing. I felt I was viewed as a ‘troublemaker’ and wanting to make a special case for Al. Al at this point was not feeling well enough to fight his own corner, but afterwards supported my efforts and told me how upset he had been. Equally, when a bed was not available on the teenage cancer unit of our preference, the nurses on the ward refer to me as ‘mum’ rather than use my name and did not ask Al for his thoughts or talk directly to him about his treatment. Everything about him was directed through me and not him: he felt invisible. For a young person who was completely involved in his treatment plans this was unacceptable. Each young person should be treated as an individual with age appropriate care and consideration given for their level of maturity’.
Alex’s mother
How can health professionals ensure they include young people in care and care decisions?
You may wish to consider:
- Why were there differences in approaches to care between the children’s oncology ward and teenage cancer unit?
- What impact could lack of inclusion have on a young person’s experience of involvement in care decisions?
- What role did Alex’s mother adopt and why?