SAGE Journal Articles

Click on the following links. Please note these will open in a new window.

INTRODUCTION TO THE ARTICLES

The study of homeland security is a challenging field of study that requires experts, students, and members of society to understand the underlying reasons for the creation of homeland security systems, as well as the configuration of these systems.  Those who examine homeland security must necessarily study data and theories grounded from a variety of disciplines, including political science, public administration, and the administration of justice.

Federal, state, and local authorities are perennially challenged by the problem of designing homeland security systems which reflect threats emanating from the current terrorist environment.  These challenges are not new, and have historically posed very serious policy questions for all sectors of society.  Unfortunately, these are challenges that are not easily resolved, and which will continue to be at the center of domestic policy.. The possibility of political violence is an unresolved problem, and exists across the nation.  There are no ideal political, national, or social solutions that guarantee immunity from the possibility of being touched by terrorist violence. 

The purpose of this online resource is to stimulate critical discussion about the attributes of homeland security systems and terrorist environments.  This resource is organized into thematic parts which correspond to the textbook’s chapters.  Articles have been selected from reputable scholarly journals, and additional articles are recommended for further study.

TEN CRITICAL THINKING QUESTIONS

  • Does a central cause exist which explains the creation of homeland security environments?
     
  • Is it possible to accurately predict the likelihood of terrorist violence?
     
  • What are the policy implications of research that indicates an association between homeland security measures and civil liberty challenges?
     
  • Do homeland security measures effectively reduce the incidence of terrorism?
     
  • Are particular levels of authority within the homeland security enterprise more effective in managing terrorist environments?
     
  • Are innovations such as target hardening effective?
     
  • How popular is the current homeland security enterprise?  What explains different public opinions in different regions?
     
  • What are some of the challenges faced by reformers who sincerely seek to reduce the extent of the homeland security enterprise in order to preserve civil liberty?
     
  • How important are international legal institutions and conventions for preventing terrorist violence?
     
  • Has enough research been conducted on the sociological and psychological impact of a pervasive homeland security environment?
     

CHAPTER 12.  Critical Outcomes: Response and Recovery

Michelle Byng engages in an examination of the redefinition of identity among Muslim Americans since the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks.  Christian Davenport presents a case study of the use of undercover investigations by government authorities of the nationalist organization Republic of New Africa during the late 1960s and early 1970s.  Keiran Hardy investigates the concept of resilience within the context of the UK’s national strategy for countering terrorism.  Karin Jordan assesses two crisis intervention techniques available to counselors when catastrophic events occur.  Michael Katz explores why, with very few exceptions, American cities do not experience violent civil disorders.    Maurer and Zoloth discus critical issues concerning biosecurity.  Tucker contributes a literature review of discussions on the interaction between the life sciences and international security.

Byng, Michelle D.  “Complex Inequalities: The Case of Muslim Americans After 9/11.”  In  American Behavioral Scientist, vol. 51 (January 2008).

Davenport, Christian.  “Understanding Covert Repressive Action: The Case of the U.S. Government Against the Republic of New Africa.”  In Journal of Conflict Resolution, 49:1 (February 2005).

Gruenewald, Jeff.  “A Comparative Examination of Homicides Perpetrated by Far-Right Extremists.”  In Homicide Studies, vol. 15 (May 2011).

Hardy, Keiran.  “Resilience in UK Counter-Terrorism.”  In Theoretical Criminology, 18:3 (2014).

Jordan, Karin.  “Providing Crisis Counseling to New Yorkers After the Terrorist Attack on the World Trade Center.”  In The Family Journal: Counseling and Therapy for Couples and Families, 10:2 (April 2002).

Katz, Michael B.  “Why Don’t American Cities Burn Very Often?”  Journal of Urban History, vol. 34 (January 2008).

Maurer, Stephen M. Maurer and Laurie Zoloth.  “Synthesizing Biosecurity.”  In Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, vol. 63 (November 2007).

Tucker, Jonathan B.  “A Biosecurity Reading List.”  In Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists,  vol. 66 (January 2010).