Understanding Homeland Security
SAGE Journal Articles
Click on the following links. Please note these will open in a new window.
INTRODUCTION TO THE ARTICLES
The study of homeland security is a challenging field of study that requires experts, students, and members of society to understand the underlying reasons for the creation of homeland security systems, as well as the configuration of these systems. Those who examine homeland security must necessarily study data and theories grounded from a variety of disciplines, including political science, public administration, and the administration of justice.
Federal, state, and local authorities are perennially challenged by the problem of designing homeland security systems which reflect threats emanating from the current terrorist environment. These challenges are not new, and have historically posed very serious policy questions for all sectors of society. Unfortunately, these are challenges that are not easily resolved, and which will continue to be at the center of domestic policy.. The possibility of political violence is an unresolved problem, and exists across the nation. There are no ideal political, national, or social solutions that guarantee immunity from the possibility of being touched by terrorist violence.
The purpose of this online resource is to stimulate critical discussion about the attributes of homeland security systems and terrorist environments. This resource is organized into thematic parts which correspond to the textbook’s chapters. Articles have been selected from reputable scholarly journals, and additional articles are recommended for further study.
TEN CRITICAL THINKING QUESTIONS
- Does a central cause exist which explains the creation of homeland security environments?
- Is it possible to accurately predict the likelihood of terrorist violence?
- What are the policy implications of research that indicates an association between homeland security measures and civil liberty challenges?
- Do homeland security measures effectively reduce the incidence of terrorism?
- Are particular levels of authority within the homeland security enterprise more effective in managing terrorist environments?
- Are innovations such as target hardening effective?
- How popular is the current homeland security enterprise? What explains different public opinions in different regions?
- What are some of the challenges faced by reformers who sincerely seek to reduce the extent of the homeland security enterprise in order to preserve civil liberty?
- How important are international legal institutions and conventions for preventing terrorist violence?
- Has enough research been conducted on the sociological and psychological impact of a pervasive homeland security environment?
CHAPTER 5. Agencies and Missions: Homeland Security at the Federal Level
Gordon Adams critiques the emphasis on military-related budgeting for national security needs. Cavelty and Mauer discuss theoretical issues involving “reflexive” intelligence. Patricia Degenarro discusses the necessity for improved collaboration between civilian authorities and the military. Devine’s contribution projects the future of intelligence and espionage. Yee-Kuang Heng posits that the designation of responses to terrorism as a rhetorical “war” poses difficulties from the perspective of risk management. Grant Martin explores the future configuration and utility of U.S. special operations forces. Zenko, Micah. “Intelligence Estimates of Nuclear Terrorism.” In The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 607 (September 2006). Micah Zenko presents an historical review of intelligence estimates of nuclear terrorism.
Adams, Gordon. “Diminishing Returns.” In Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, vol. 62 (May 2006).
Devine, Jack. “Tomorrow’s Spygames.” In World Policy Jouranal, vol. 25 (September 2008).