2. Planning for Analysis
Click on the following links. Please note these will open in a new window
Presents a (preferred) interactive approach to design as an alternative to more linear typological designs. This chapter also illustrates the problem of the way in which “methods in use” often differ from those described in a publication.
Explains necessary design features for a mixed methods project that apply regardless of the specific methods of data collection being used. Gorard (2013) provides a more comprehensive general text on design features that contribute to building warranted conclusions.
Critiques typological approaches to design and recommends focusing on where the point or points of interface will occur in designing a study as an alternative for complex projects.
Describes and illustrates elements of a good mixed methods funding proposal, including the value of having a theoretical framework and pre-tested methods.