Want to explore further? Search for these readings to expand your knowledge.

A traditional, scholarly, critical literature review:

Scambler, G. (2009). Health-related stigma. Sociology of Health & Illness, 31(3), 441–455. Retrieved from http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1467-9566.2009.01161.x/abstract

A ‘systematic’ review of quantitative studies:

Horrocks, S., Anderson, E., & Salisbury, C. (2002). Systematic review of whether nurse practitioners working in primary care can provide equivalent care to doctors. British Medical Journal, 324, 819–823. Retrieved from http://www.bmj.com/content/324/7341/819

A ‘systematic review’ of qualitative studies:

Morton, R. L., Tong, A., Howard, K., Snelling, P., & Webster, A. C. (2010). The views of patients and carers in treatment decision making for chronic kidney disease: Systematic review and thematic synthesis of qualitative studies. British Medical Journal, 340, c112. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/41088072_The_views_of_patients_and_carers_in_treatment_decision_making_for_chronic_kidney_disease_Systematic_review_and_thematic_synthesis_of_qualitative_studies

An analysis and critique of the systematic reviewing movement:

Moreira, T. (2007). Entangled evidence: Knowledge making in systematic reviews in healthcare. Sociology of Health & Illness, 29(2), 180–197. Retrieved from http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1467-9566.2007.00531.x/full